Franklin Barley: Patent Law and Plant Breeders' Rights
Download (119.98 kB)
Description
This paper considers the relationship between patent law and plant breeders' rights in light of modern developments in biotechnology. It examines how a number of superior courts have sought to manage the tensions and conflicts between these competing schemes of intellectual property protection. Part 1 considers the High Court of Australia case of Grain Pool of Western Australia v the Commonwealth dealing with Franklin barley. Part 2 examines the significance of the Supreme Court of the United...[Show more]
dc.contributor.author | Rimmer, Matthew | |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2003-11-28 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2004-05-19T14:20:09Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-05T08:36:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2004-05-19T14:20:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-01-05T08:36:08Z | |
dc.date.created | 2003 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1321-8247 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/41117 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/41117 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper considers the relationship between patent law and plant breeders' rights in light of modern developments in biotechnology. It examines how a number of superior courts have sought to manage the tensions and conflicts between these competing schemes of intellectual property protection. Part 1 considers the High Court of Australia case of Grain Pool of Western Australia v the Commonwealth dealing with Franklin barley. Part 2 examines the significance of the Supreme Court of the United States decision in JEM Ag Supply Inc v Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc with respect to utility patents and hybrid seed. Part 3 considers the Supreme Court of Canada case of Harvard College v the Commissioner of Patents dealing with the transgenic animal, oncomouse, and discusses its implications for the forthcoming appeal from the Federal Court case of Percy Schmeiser v Monsanto. | |
dc.format.extent | 122864 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 359 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/octet-stream | |
dc.language.iso | en_AU | |
dc.publisher | Murdoch University | |
dc.source | eLaw Journal | |
dc.source.uri | http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v10n4/rimmer104.html | |
dc.title | Franklin Barley: Patent Law and Plant Breeders' Rights | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
local.description.notes | This paper is in press, and will be published on-line in December 2003. | |
local.description.refereed | yes | |
local.identifier.citationmonth | dec | |
local.identifier.citationnumber | 4 | |
local.identifier.citationpublication | Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law | |
local.identifier.citationvolume | 10 | |
local.identifier.citationyear | 2003 | |
local.identifier.eprintid | 2311 | |
local.rights.ispublished | inpress | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
local.identifier.absfor | 180115 - Intellectual Property Law | |
local.identifier.ariespublication | MigratedxPub5812 | |
local.type.status | Published Version | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Rimmer, Matthew, ANU College of Law, ANU | |
local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 4 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 1 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 12 | |
dc.date.updated | 2015-12-11T09:33:53Z | |
Collections | ANU Research Publications |
Download
File | Description | Size | Format | Image |
---|---|---|---|---|
FranklinBarley.pdf | 119.98 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Updated: 17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer: University Librarian/ Page Contact: Library Systems & Web Coordinator