Preliminary findings and codebook for the How Fair, How Effective Survey: The Collection and Use of Taxation in Australia
Date
Authors
Braithwaite, Valerie
Reinhart, Monika
Australian National University. Centre for Tax System Integrity
Australian Taxation Office
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Centre for Tax System Integrity (CTSI), Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University
Australian Taxation Office
Australian Taxation Office
Abstract
The How Fair, How Effective Survey – The Collection and Use of Taxation in Australia
(HFHES 2005) was designed as a follow-up survey to the Community Hopes, Fears and
Actions Survey (CHFAS 2000) conducted in 2000 and the Australian Tax System – Fair or
Not Survey (ATSFONS 2002) conducted in 2002. The ATSFONS 2002 was sent to all
those who had returned CHFAS 2000 questionnaires and ATSFONS 2002 questionnaires,
and who had not asked to be withdrawn from the sample after completing the ATSFONS
2002. Of the 2740 sampled, 2261 were contactable at the mailing address we had for them
and were in sufficiently good health to take part. Of this contactable sample, completed
questionnaires were received from 1146 (51%). This working paper presents the
breakdown of responses to each of the questions in the HFHES 2005. In addition,
information is provided on the social demographic profile of those who had completed the
surveys in 2000 and 2002, but dropped out of the 2005 survey either because they refused
or because they could not be contacted. Finally, this working paper reviews some key
findings from the sample of 509 respondents who completed all three surveys, the CHFAS
2000, the ATSFONS 2002, and the HFHES 2005. This set of panel data provides
information on Australians’ views of the tax system and its administration that have
prevailed in the first 5 years of tax reform. Despite some biases in the socio-demographic
makeup of the panel sample, there is no evidence that the views of this panel are at odds
with those of the larger cross-sectional samples.
The review shows most Australians expressing high levels of tax morale in so far as they
were committed to the idea that everyone should pay their taxes honestly. They took pride
in being an honest taxpayer, and their preference was for a tax agent who would do their
tax for them honestly and without fuss. There was less overwhelming support, however,
for the administration of the tax system and the use of tax dollars. The percentage of
Australians who expressed trust in the Australian Taxation Office (Tax Office) to act on
behalf of all Australians was just over 50% with a drop of 10 percentage points from 2002
to 2005. A similar drop was found in the percentage of Australians who had a clear
understanding of what the Tax Office expected of them as taxpayers (from 48% to 38%).
Around 40% doubted that the Tax Office had the power to deal effectively with high
wealth individuals and large corporates who do not pay their tax, but the number dropped
to less than 10% when considering Tax Office power over taxpayers of more modest
means. From an administrative perspective, adherence to the principles of the Taxpayers’
Charter (at least most times) was acknowledged by just over 70% of taxpayers, with an
increase of 8 percentage points over the five-year period of the research. Just over 70%
were satisfied with the decisions of the Tax Office in relation to their own tax affairs in
2000, but this fell to just over 50% in 2002 and 2005. In terms of the impact of tax on
lifestyle, around 40% expressed the view that paying tax was holding them back from
achieving in life, around 30% preferred to pay less tax and receive fewer services, and
around 20% were satisfied with the way in which the government spent taxpayers’ money.
Over the period of the research, there seemed to be an upward trend in interest in financial
planning in order to reduce tax. The gap that is developing between Australians’
aspirations for the tax system and actual outcomes presents a challenge for the Tax Office
if it wants a sustainable voluntary taxpaying system that involves the general community.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Working/Technical Paper
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description