Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

ATSIC's achievements and strengths: Implications for institutional reform

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Sanders, Will

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Canberra, ACT : Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), The Australian National University

Abstract

'ATSIC's achievements and strengths: Implications for institutional reform' by Will Sanders. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) has been criticized from many sides in the fifteen years since it was established. But what about ATSIC’s achievements and strengths? CAEPR Fellow Will Sanders argues that, over its fourteen year history, ATSIC has indeed achieved much and displayed considerable strengths. He discusses ATSIC’s achievements and strengths under six headings: - political participation of Indigenous people, - a national Indigenous voice increasingly independent of government, - distinctive, appropriate programs, - regionalism, - working with States and Territories, and - distinctive Torres Strait Islander arrangements. I believe all these areas of achievement and strength are signifi cant and need to be built on in current processes of institutional reform. My concluding comments begin with some of the fi ndings of the fi nal report of the 2003 ATSIC review panel, which sought to restructure rather than abolish ATSIC. This approach refl ected the fi ndings of an earlier Public Discussion Paper produced by the review which noted that there was ‘overwhelming support among key stakeholders’ for a national body representative of Indigenous people’s interests even though there was ‘very little support for ATSIC’s current performance’ (Hannaford, Collins and Huggins 2003: 24). I too would argue that there is support and a need for a national Indigenous representative body and that ATSIC should not be abolished unless, or until, some replacement representative arrangement is negotiated with Indigenous people.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

abcd