Chillagoe : from archaeology to prehistory - contributions to a late holocene prehistory of the Chillagoe region, north Queensland
Abstract
I have chosen to begin my thesis with a quote from Foucault for a very specific
reason. The reason is this: whereas the ancient practice of history attempted to
transform the material by-products of human actions (monuments in Foucault's
words) into documents, the underlying assumption behind this work is that I have
begun with a document, which I have transformed as a result of the investigations
reported in this thesis. The resultant work is itself a monument, which is a product
of the socio-cultural conventions through which I, as analyst, have filtered the
"data". Now by using the word "history" I refer to the practice of attempting to
understand, or decipher, the past. I do not, of course, begin with the assumption
that history can be retrieved from its material remains: rather, the practice of history
is a transformation. To use Foucault's words, it is an attempt to define the
"unities, totalities, series and relations" within the documentary material (Foucault,
1974: 7). The document is not an inert material, in which the historical truth, as past
reality, is frozen; it is not a fundamental memory of history. History, rather,
reflects the way in which a society perceives its present reality in the face of amassed
documentation: it is the current social relations which transforms historical truths
into new ones, through the system of ideas to which the analyst has been subjected.
As De Saussure (1959: 67) states, a document, as a work represented by symbolic
expression (language), is a combination of a concept (symbol as signified) and of an
image (symbol as signifier). It is the ideas associated with the document that gives
the latter meaning.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description