The Complexities of Green Economy Policy Reform: a case study in Aceh, Indonesia
Abstract
As the world continues its search for effective approaches to
sustainable development, a green economy has been touted as a
‘triple-win’ solution. This thesis applies a political
economy framework to examine the prospects and barriers for
achieving green economy policy reforms. It questions simplistic
assumptions regarding the feasibility of ‘triple-win
solutions’ in green economy literature. The thesis instead
reveals the conflicts, trade-offs and power dynamics that
ultimately determine whether or not a green economy can be
realised in practice.
The research focuses on the Aceh Green intervention, initiated in
2007 in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Aceh Green was one of the first
attempts globally to transform economic and environmental
management systems in an integrated, cross-sectoral manner, as
envisaged by green economy engineers. An analysis of the
shortcomings of Aceh Green, which failed to survive a change of
political leadership, provides new insights into the difficult
realities of green economy policy reform, and highlights problems
within the approach and its assumptions.
I argue that Aceh Green failed to achieve its vision of a private
sector driven transition towards a new economic system due to
three related reasons: 1) the risk versus reward balance was not
sufficient for ‘green investors’; 2) actors with vested
economic and political interests resisted change; and 3) the Aceh
Green intervention was unable to build coalitions for change that
may have helped to overcome these obstacles.
Case study findings raise important questions regarding the
viability of a green economy approach to sustainable development
in Aceh, and beyond. Fundamentally, the green economy approach,
with its reliance on market based solutions, is vulnerable to the
local investment climate as well as the lack of mature markets
for ‘green commodities’. Furthermore, entrenched political
and economic elites can undermine the institutional reforms on
which the green economy concept is founded.
The study therefore proposes that green economy efforts must be
founded upon a deeper understanding of the nuanced political
economy at play in different settings. The dilemma of realising a
green economy is exposed as an elemental struggle between actors
over the management of and access to natural resources and the
benefits derived from them. The process of navigating these
complexities needs to receive greater attention. In contrast,
much of the current normative work on a green economy emphasises
the desired policies and outcomes without factoring in the
difficulties of the reform process that must be addressed. More
consideration is needed of specific and early interventions that
shift beliefs and realign economic incentives amongst critical
actors. Without this, attempts at green economy policy reform
will fail to build the necessary coalitions for change to counter
vested interests.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description