Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Influenza vaccine effectiveness for hospital and community patients using control groups with and without non-influenza respiratory viruses detected, Auckland, New Zealand 2014

Pierse, Nevil; Kelly, Heath; Thompson, Mark G; Bissielo, Ange; Radke, S.; Huang, Sue Q; Baker, Michael; Turner, Nikki

Description

Background: We aimed to estimate the protection afforded by inactivated influenza vaccine, in both community and hospital settings, in a well characterised urban population in Auckland during 2014. Methods: We used two different comparison groups, all patients who tested negative for influenza and only those patients who tested negative for influenza and had a non-influenza respiratory virus detected, to calculate the vaccine effectiveness in a test negative study design. Estimates were made...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorPierse, Nevil
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Heath
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Mark G
dc.contributor.authorBissielo, Ange
dc.contributor.authorRadke, S.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Sue Q
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Michael
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Nikki
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T23:20:43Z
dc.identifier.issn0264-410X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/103517
dc.description.abstractBackground: We aimed to estimate the protection afforded by inactivated influenza vaccine, in both community and hospital settings, in a well characterised urban population in Auckland during 2014. Methods: We used two different comparison groups, all patients who tested negative for influenza and only those patients who tested negative for influenza and had a non-influenza respiratory virus detected, to calculate the vaccine effectiveness in a test negative study design. Estimates were made separately for general practice outpatient consultations and hospitalised patients, stratified by age group and byinfluenza type and subtype. Vaccine status was confirmed by electronic record for general practice patients and all respiratory viruses were detected by real time polymerase chain reaction. Results: 1039 hospitalised and 1154 general practice outpatient consultations met all the study inclusion criteria and had a respiratory sample tested for influenza and other respiratory viruses. Compared to general practice patients, hospitalised patients were more likely to be very young or very old, to be Maori or Pacific Islander, to have a low income and to suffer from chronic disease. Vaccine effectiveness ¯ (VE) adjusted for age and other participant characteristics using all influenza negative controls was 42% (95% CI: 16 to 60%) for hospitalised and 56% (95% CI: 35 to 70%) for general practice patients. The vaccine appeared to be most effective against the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 strain with an adjusted VE of 62% (95% CI:38 to 77%) for hospitalised and 59% (95% CI:36 to 74%) for general practice patients, using influenza virus negative controls. Similar results found when patients testing positive for a non-influenza respiratory virus were used as the control group. Conclusion: This study contributes to validation of the test negative design and confirms that inactivated influenza vaccines continue to provide modest but significant protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza.
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceVaccine
dc.titleInfluenza vaccine effectiveness for hospital and community patients using control groups with and without non-influenza respiratory viruses detected, Auckland, New Zealand 2014
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume34
dc.date.issued2016
local.identifier.absfor160305 - Population Trends and Policies
local.identifier.ariespublicationU3488905xPUB8304
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationPierse, Nevil, The University of Otago
local.contributor.affiliationKelly, Heath, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationThompson, Mark G, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
local.contributor.affiliationBissielo, Ange, Institute of Environmental Science and Research,
local.contributor.affiliationRadke, S., The University of Auckland
local.contributor.affiliationHuang, Sue Q, Institute of Environmental Science and Research
local.contributor.affiliationBaker, Michael, University of Otago
local.contributor.affiliationTurner, Nikki, The University of Auckland
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage503
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage509
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.073
dc.date.updated2016-06-14T08:52:00Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84952990772
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Pierse_Influenza_vaccine_2016.pdf226.28 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator