Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Can FTAs support the growth or spread of international production networks in Asia?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Menon, Jayant

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University

Access Statement

Open Access

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Free trade agreements (FTAs) have been proliferating in Asia for more than a decade. International fragmentation of production and the resultant cross-border production networks have been growing for a much longer period. Although FTAs are not necessary for the formation of production networks, can they support their further growth or spread? Empirical studies have produced mixed results, presumably because the causality can run either way. Therefore, this paper employs a qualitative approach that carefully examines the characteristics of both product fragmentation trade and FTAs in Asia to ascertain possible linkages. We find the relationship to be tenuous for a number of reasons. First, most product fragmentation trade already takes place at zero or low tariffs because of the International Technology Agreement, various duty-drawback schemes, and the location of most multinationals in duty-exempt export processing zones. Second, much of fragmentation trade is unlikely to benefit from FTA tariff concessions given the inability to satisfy rules of origin because of limited value-addition. Third, almost all FTAs involving Asian countries are relatively shallow, and there are still some non-tariff barriers that affect this trade. For these reasons, national liberalization actions that deal with incumbency issues would be the best way forward.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Working papers in trade and development

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads