Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Loss of preferential access to the protected EU sugar market: Fiji's response

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Anderson, Kym

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University

Access Statement

Open Access

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The Fiji Government's response since 2010 to the loss of preferential access to the European Union's previously highly protected sugar market has been to increasingly support its producers. That support is now much higher than most other countries' assistance to the sugar sector. This study provides detailed estimates of the changing extent of those transfers to producers from both taxpayers and consumers during 2010-21. In doing so it estimates for the first time an annual time series of nominal rates of assistance to producers and consumer tax equivalent rates (NRAs and CTEs, but they are also converted to producer and consumer support estimates as defined by the OECD). Those NRA and CTE estimates may well now exceed 100%. The level of support was equivalent to 10% of Fiji's agricultural value added in 2018-21 and is around 5% of its government's consolidated revenue - at a time when the government has had one of the highest debt-to-GDP ratios, at 80% in 2021. Since the nature of the support is economically inefficient, inequitable, environmentally damaging and fiscally unsustainable given foreseeable market prospects, suggestions are made as to how that support might be gradually re-purposed to provide better economic, social and environmental outcomes.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Working papers in trade and development

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until