Genauer, Jessica
Description
Rebuilding a contested state following an authoritarian breakdown
requires widespread support for the new political system from all
communal groups. A central theoretical assertion of the
institutional design literature is that inclusion of communal
groups in institutional frameworks creates support for a
political system. However, empirical evidence to either verify or
refute this claim is inconclusive. A survey of institutional
design literature reveals an...[Show more] implicit distinction between de jure
inclusion (inclusive frameworks) and de facto inclusion
(inclusion in practice). To date, this distinction has not been
sufficiently differentiated and systematically examined, with
large-N studies most often examining the impact solely of de jure
inclusion on support, and case studies failing to make a clear
conceptual distinction
between these two elements of inclusion. To address this gap in
the research, this study asks: during a period of political
transition in a contested state, does de jure inclusion, de facto
inclusion, or a combination of both, build support for a
political system?
To investigate this question, the study undertakes a small-N
comparative study of institutional design during political
transitions in the Middle East and North Africa region. Four
countries are selected that underwent rebuilding of their
political institutions following authoritarian breakdown: Egypt,
Iraq, Libya, and Tunisia. Four hypotheses are advanced that
capture the expectation that either de jure inclusion, de facto
inclusion, or a combination of both, will build support for a
political system. The hypotheses are investigated in two key
institutional design moments in the selected countries: electoral
system design and constitution-making.
The study finds that de jure inclusion is not a sufficient
mechanism to create support of all communal groups for the
political system, whilst de facto inclusion may be sufficient. In
no case where de jure inclusion alone was observed, was support
for the political system present. In all cases where de facto
inclusion was present, there was support for the political
system, regardless of whether or not there was de jure inclusion.
The study contributes to our understanding of the rebuilding of
contested states following authoritarian breakdown, suggesting
that, alongside an emphasis on de jure inclusion in electoral
system design and constitution-making, de facto inclusion
deserves consideration.
Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.