Economic evaluation alongside a cluster-randomised-controlled trial of intensive management by Indigenous Health Workers of Indigenous people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in remote Australia : Was "Getting Better at Chronic Care" cost effective?

McDermott, RobynCallander, EmilySegal, LeonieNgyuen, HaWenitong, MarkCentre of Research Excellence (CRE) for the Prevention of Chronic Conditions in Rural and Remote High Risk Populations2019-02-052019-02-05McDermott R, Callander E, Segal l, Nguyen H, Wenitong M. (2017). Was "Getting Better at Chronic Care" cost effective? Report prepared for the Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute (APHCRI), Canberra, ACT: Australia, http://hdl.handle.net/1885/155558http://hdl.handle.net/1885/155558This paper reports on two economic evaluations of the GBACC project. The first evaluation completed a cost-consequence analysis, in which the costs of implementing the model are compared with differential changes in a range of health outcome measures of study participants in the intervention and usual care groups. The second economic evaluation looked at hospitalisations related to diabetes, especially those which had been shown in previous reports to be excessive among remote Indigenous adults, mostly acute preventable diabetes-related infections and complicationsThe research reported in this paper is a project of the Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, which is supported by a grant from the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing under the Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development Strategy.3 vols.application/pdfen-AUAuthor/s retain copyright.Economic evaluation alongside a cluster-randomised-controlled trial of intensive management by Indigenous Health Workers of Indigenous people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in remote Australia : Was "Getting Better at Chronic Care" cost effective?2017