Gibbs, AdrianGibbs, MarkArmstrong, John2015-12-132015-12-130304-8608http://hdl.handle.net/1885/79595Different tree-building methods consistently place the SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) as a basal Group 2 coronavirus rather than as an ungrouped species as concluded by others. Detailed comparisons of the SARS-CoV genomic sequence with those of six other coronaviruses failed to find evidence of recombination or genomic rearrangement using computational methods designed for that purpose.Keywords: animal; Arterivirus; article; biology; classification; Coronavirus; genetics; human; methodology; mouse; phylogeny; SARS coronavirus; sequence alignment; virus genome; Animals; Arterivirus; Computational Biology; Coronavirus; Genome, Viral; Humans; Mice;The phylogeny of SARS coronavirus200410.1007/s00705-003-0244-02015-12-11