Morrison, Geoffrey2015-12-101355-0306http://hdl.handle.net/1885/54292We are in the midst of a paradigm shift in the forensic comparison sciences. The new paradigm can be characterised as quantitative data-based implementation of the likelihood-ratio framework with quantitative evaluation of the reliability of results. TheKeywords: Australia; controlled study; DNA fingerprinting; jurisprudence; law enforcement; letter; quantitative analysis; reliability; Spain; voice; Bayes Theorem; Forensic Medicine; Humans; Likelihood Functions; Reproducibility of Results; Voice Forensic speaker identification; Forensic speaker recognition; Forensic voice comparison; Likelihood ratio; Paradigm shift; Reliability200910.1016/j.scijus.2009.09.0022016-02-24