‘No evidence of harm’ implies no evidence of safety: Framing the lack of causal evidence in gambling advertising research

Newall, PhilipAllami, YoussefAndrade, MairaAyton, PeterBaker-Frampton, RosalindBennett, DanielBrowne, MatthewBunn, ChristopherBush-Evans, ReeceChen, SoniaCollard, SharonDe Jans, SteffiDerevensky, JeffreyDowling, Nicki A.Dymond, SimonFroude, AndreeGoyder, ElizabethHeirene, Robert M.Hing, NerileeHudders, LiselotHunt, KateJames, Richard J.E.Li, EnLudvig, Elliot A.Marionneau, VirveMcGrane, EllenMerkouris, Stephanie S.Orford, JimParrado-González, AlbertoPryce, RobertRockloff, MatthewRomild, UllaRossi, RaffaelloRussell, Alex M.T.Singmann, HenrikQuosai, Trudy SmitStark, SashaSuomi, AinoSwanton, Thomas B.Talberg, NiriThoma, VolkerTorrance, JamieTulloch, Catherinevan Holst, Ruth J.Walasek, LukaszWardle, HeatherWest, JaneWheaton, JamieXiao, Leon Y.Young, Matthew M.Bellringer, Maria E.Sharman, SteveRoberts, Amanda2025-06-022025-06-020965-2140PubMed:37953345WOS:001103570000001http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176779151&partnerID=8YFLogxKhttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733756496None.6enCausal evidencegambling advertisinggambling marketinggambling-related harmpolicyregulation‘No evidence of harm’ implies no evidence of safety: Framing the lack of causal evidence in gambling advertising research2023-11-1210.1111/add.1636985176779151