Sandgren, AlexanderSteele, Katie2021-02-222021-02-220039-7857http://hdl.handle.net/1885/224134In this paper, we develop a novel response to counterfactual scepticism, the thesis that most ordinary counterfactual claims are false. In the process we aim to shed light on the relationship between debates in the philosophy of science and debates concerning the semantics and pragmatics of counterfactuals. We argue that science is concerned with many domains of inquiry, each with its own characteristic entities and regularities; moreover, statements of scientifc law often include an implicit ceteris paribus clause that restricts the scope of the associated regularity to circumstances that are ‘ftting’ to the domain in question. This observation reveals a way of responding to scepticism while, at the same time, doing justice both to the role of counterfactuals in science and to the complexities inherent in ordinary counterfactual discourse and reasoning.application/pdfen-AU© The Author(s) 2020http://creativecommons.org/licen ses/by/4.0/CounterfactualsCounterfactual scepticismCeteris paribus lawsContextualismHájek202010.1007/s11229-020-02742-92020-11-15Creative Commons licence