Martschini, M.Forstner, OGolser, RobinKutschera, WalterPavetich, StefanPriller, AlfredSteier, PSuter, MWallner, Anton2015-12-13Septemberhttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/84597Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) of36Cl (t1/2 = 0.30 Ma) at natural isotopic concentrations requires high particle energies for the separation from the stable isobar36S and was so far the exclusive domain of tandem accelerators with at least 5 MV terminal voltage. Using terminal foil stripping and a detection setup consisting of a split-anode ionization chamber and an additional energy signal from a silicon strip detector, a36S suppression of >104 at 3 MV terminal voltage was achieved. To further increase the36S suppression energy loss straggling in various counter gases (C4H10, Ar-CH4 and C4H10-Ar) and the effect of "energy focusing" below the maximum of the Bragg curve was investigated. The comparison of experimental data with simulations and published data yielded interesting insights into the physics underlying the detectors. Energy loss, energy straggling and angular scattering determine the36S suppression. In addition, we improved ion source conditions, target backing materials and the cathode design with respect to sulfur output and cross contamination. These changes allow higher currents during measurement (35Cl- current ≈ 5 μA) and also increased the reproducibility. An injector to detector efficiency for36Cl ions of 8% (16% stripping yield for the 7+ charge state in the accelerator, 50%36Cl detection efficiency) was achieved, which can favorably be compared to other facilities. The memory effect in our ion source was also thoroughly investigated. Currently our measured blank value is36Cl/Cl ≈ 3 × 10-15 when samples with a ratio of 10-11 are used in the same sample wheel and36Cl/Cl ≈ 5 × 10-16 if measured together with samples with a ratio of 10-12 or below. This is in good agreement with the lowest so far published isotope ratios around 5 × 10-16 and demonstrates that 3 MV tandems can achieve the same sensitivity for36Cl as larger machines.Keywords: Accelerator mass spectrometry; AMS; Angular scattering; Backing materials; Bragg curves; Cathode design; Charge state; Cl- ions; Cross contamination; Detection efficiency; Detection setup; Detector efficiency; Energy loss; Energy loss straggling; Energy s 36Cl; AMS; Energy loss straggling; Isobar separation201110.1016/j.nimb.2011.04.0162016-06-14