Truong, JenniferShadbolt, BruceOoi, MarieChitturi, ShivakumarKaye, GFarrell, GeoffreyTeoh, Narcissus2022-06-151444-0903http://hdl.handle.net/1885/267289Background: Entecavir and tenofovir potently suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication so that serum HBV DNA levels <20 IU/mL can be achieved after 2 years. Despite this, inadequate suppression is reported in >20% of cases for unclear reasons. Aim: We tested whether 4-week viral load (VL) assessment could improve 96-week treatment outcome. Methods: Data on all chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir between 2005 and 2014 were entered prospectively. Full data capture included pre-treatment, weeks 4, 24, 48 and 96 HBV DNA titre, HBeAg, age, gender, antiviral agent and dose escalation. Compliance data were compiled from pharmacy records, doctors’ letters and clinic bookings/attendance. Time to achieve complete viral suppression (HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL) was graphed using Kaplan–Meier curves. Factors affecting this were examined using a multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard model. Results: Among 156 patients treated, 72 received entecavir and 84 tenofovir. Pre-treatment HBV DNA titre, 4-week assessment and compliance impacted significantly on time to complete viral suppression. At 96 weeks, 90% of those assessed as compliant by 4-week HBV DNA had complete viral suppression versus 50% followed by 6-month VL estimation. Continuing care by the same physician was related to 4-week VL testing and optimal compliance. Conclusions: Medium-term outcomes of HBV antiviral therapy are improved by early on-treatment VL testing, facilitating patient engagement and improved compliance. The observation that 90% complete viral suppression after 2 years monotherapy is achievable in a routine clinic setting questions the need for combination therapy in HBV cases with suboptimal responseapplication/pdfen-AU© 2016 Royal Australasian College of PhysiciansentecavirtenofovircomplianceHBV viral loadon-treatment monitoringreal world therapy201710.1111/imj.132442021-02-14