Jackson, Frank2015-12-070967-2559http://hdl.handle.net/1885/17864Physicalists are committed to the determination without remainder of the psychological by the physical, but are they committed to this determination being a priori? This paper distinguishes this question understood de dicto from this question understood de re, argues that understood de re the answer is yes in a way that leaves open the answer to the question understood de dicto.On ensuring that Physicalism is not a dual Attribute Theory in Sheep's Clothing200610.1007/s11098-006-5989-32015-12-07