Thakur, Ramesh2015-12-072053-8626http://hdl.handle.net/1885/27436The civilian protection agenda has tried to fill critical gaps in the existing normative architecture through the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and protection of civilians (POC) as sibling norms.1 Despite these two valuable additions to the repertoire of the international community in dealing with civilian victims of armed conflicts, many gaps remain in the protection agenda, as shown in several cases—from Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar to Darfur and, most prominently this year, Syria.Published under a Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.020142020-11-08