Matthews, Stephen A.Stiberman, LauraRaymer, JamesYang, Tse-ChuanGayawan, EzraSaita, SayambhuTun, Sai Thein ThanParker, Daniel M.Balk, DeborahLeyk, StefanMontgomery, MarkCurtis, Katherine J.Wong, David W. S.2022-06-232022-06-232164-7070http://hdl.handle.net/1885/267484In 2011 a specialist meeting on the “Future Directions in Spatial Demography” was held in Santa Barbara, California (Matthews, Goodchild, & Janelle, 2012).1 This specialist meeting was the capstone to a multi-year National Institutes of Health training grant that had supported workshops in advanced spatial analysis methods increasing used by population scientists.2 Early-career scholars who had participated in the training workshops and senior demographers and geographers drawn from across the United States participated in the specialist meeting.3 The application process to attend the 2011 meeting, required that each of the forty-one attendees submit a statement that reviewed challenges and identifed new directions for spatial demography, including gaps in current knowledge regarding innovations in geospatial data, spatial statistical methods, and the integration of data and models to enhance the science of spatial demography in population and health research. Reading again some of the ruminations of these scholars is an interesting exercise in its own right. The level of optimism back in 2011 was high, and especially regarding anticipated changes in computational capacity, leveraging big data (including volunteered geographic information), developments in data systems (including new data high resolution data products and online resources such as multi-scale map interfaces and dashboards), and in methods such as time–space models, agent-based models, microsimulation, and small-area estimation. There were also several challenges identifed including, but not limited to, study designs, data integration, data validation, confdentiality, non-representative data, historic data, defnitions of place, residential selection and mobility as well as two overarching challenges related to the role and contribution of spatial demographers in interdisciplinary population and health research, and many, many comments on training issues. Substantively the attendees research focused on all forms of interaction between people and place (and the reciprocal relations between the people in social, built, and physical environment contexts) covering the gamut of demographic processes from reproductive health to mortality, though with perhaps an overrepresentation of researchers in areas related to population and environment research, racial and residential segregation, and migration.The R25 Training Grant was funded through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD 5R-25 HD057002; Principal Investigator: Stephen A. Matthews). .application/pdfen-AU© The Author(s) 2021https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/2021-05-2010.1007/s40980-021-00084-92021-05-23Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License