Glanville, Luke2015-12-130384-9694http://hdl.handle.net/1885/84595This essay responds to Esther Reed's recent critique of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle in this journal. It argues that Reed fundamentally misunderstands and misrepresents R2P. Her critique of R2P would have served well as a critique of theKeywords: genocide; human rights; humanitarian intervention; just war; mass atrocities; Responsibility to Protect201310.1111/jore.120082016-02-24