Hall, Michael2015-12-071751-8113http://hdl.handle.net/1885/21719In a recent paper (Hall 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 41 255301), I made several critical remarks on a 'Hermitian time operator' proposed by Galapon (2002 Proc. R. Soc. A 458 2671). Galapon has correctly pointed out that remarks pertaining to 'denseness' of the commutator domain are wrong (Galapon 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 018001). However, the other remarks still apply, and it is further noted that a given quantum system can be a member of this domain only at a set of times of total measure zero.Reply to 'Comment on 'Almost-periodic time observables for bound quantum systems''200810.1088/1751-8113/42/1/0180022015-12-07