Sturgiss, ElizabethLuig, TheaCampbell-Scherer, Denise L.Lewanczuk, RichardGreen, Lee A.2019-01-222019-01-221756-0500http://hdl.handle.net/1885/155216Objective: Knowledge transfer is the process of information sharing between researchers, knowledge users and policy makers. Globally, public policies about obesity do not refect the complexity of what is known about the cause and efects of obesity. We used Concept Maps, a qualitative method that represents mental models, to compare the understanding of obesity between policy makers in a Canadian province and local primary care researchers. Eight participants were interviewed during which a Concept Map was developed using "C-map Tools" software. Maps were then colour-coded to identify themes and concepts in the maps. Finally, the team synthesised the fndings from each of the maps and presented them back to each of the participants. Results: All participants had mental models with rich details on the complexity of obesity for individuals, community, and at the policy level. Clinician-researchers had more focus on medical management than policy makers although most participants lacked concepts on the role of primary care in obesity management. A shared understanding of obesity could assist researchers and policy makers in developing a relevant and efective strategy. Concept Mapping provides a novel and creative way to visually compare diferent understandings of health-related topics. Keywords: Obesity, Primary care, Research, Knowledge translation, Health policy, CanadaES was supported by an Australian Government Endeavour Research Fellow‑ ship for her time in Canada. DCS was awarded a Northern Alberta Academic Family Medicine Fund (University of Alberta internal grant) to fund aspects of this projectapplication/pdfen-AU© The Author(s) 2019.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/2019-01-1410.1186/s13104-018-4042-x2019-01-20