Guillaumier, AshleighBonevski, BilliePaul, Christine LD'Este, CatherineTwyman, LauraPalazzi, KerrinOldmeadow, Christopher2018-11-292018-11-291661-7827http://hdl.handle.net/1885/153235An investigation of beliefs used to rationalise smoking will have important implications for the content of anti-smoking programs targeted at socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, who show the lowest rates of cessation in the population. This study aimed to assess the types of self-exempting beliefs reported by a sample of socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers, and identify associations between these beliefs and other smoking-related factors with quit intentions. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from March–December 2012 with smokers seeking welfare assistance in New South Wales (NSW), Australia (n= 354; response rate 79%). Responses to a 16-item self-exempting beliefs scale and intention to quit, smoker identity, and enjoyment of smoking were assessed. Most participants earned <AUD$400/week (70%), and had not completed secondary schooling (64%). All “jungle” beliefs (normalising the dangers of smoking due to ubiquity of risk) and selected “skeptic” beliefs were endorsed by 25%–47% of the sample, indicating these smokers may not fully understand the extensive risks associated with smoking. Smokers with limited quit intentions held significantly stronger self-exempting beliefs than those contemplating or preparing to quit (all p< 0.01). After adjusting for smoking-related variables only “skeptic” beliefs were significantly associated with intention to quit (p= 0.02). Some of these beliefs are incorrect and could be addressed in anti-smoking campaigns.application/pdf201610.3390/ijerph130101182018-11-29