Dowding, Keithvan Hees, Martin2009-08-062010-12-202009-08-062010-12-20Economics and Philosophy 24.1 (2008): 97-1030266-26711474-0028http://hdl.handle.net/10440/648http://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/10440/648We would like to thank Ian Carter and Matthew Kramer for their challenging reply to our recent article. Dowding and van Hees (2007) is one of a series of articles in which we try to address measurement issues with regard to individual freedom. Our aim is to provide a conception of freedom that will eventually yield a way of measuring the relative freedom of groups of people within a society and a relative measure of freedom across societies. In doing so, we draw upon the important work of Carter (1999) and Kramer (2003), but as should be clear, we also depart from it in several respects.7 pageshttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php "Author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing) … [and] can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) … on institutional repository. ... Publisher copyright and source must be acknowledged. Must link to publisher version. ...Publishers version/PDF may be used in an institutional repository ... after 12 month embargo" - from SHERPA/RoMEO site (as at 30/03/10) © 2008 Cambridge University PressCounterfactual success again: response to Carter and Kramer2008-0310.1017/S02662671080016972015-12-08