Murphy, JohnColes, Rita C2017-05-012017-05-0120177315231641035-3828http://hdl.handle.net/1885/116278rticularly the post-war affirmation of the independent family, with its commitments to domesticity as a basis of citizenship, but in a period when a severe housing shortage also signalled uncertainties about the reliability of the economic boon. The paper then examines in detail the evolution of the 1956 Agreement within the conservative parties, the Commonwealth bureaucracy and the Cabinet. It concludes that, even though home-ownership emerges from these debates as a central ideological priority for the Menzies government, Cabinet thwarted the attempt of Senator Spooner — as the responsible minister — to abolish the CSHA altogether.Australian Policy Online (APO)'s Linked Data II project, funded by the Australian Research Council, with partners at the ANU Library, Swinburne University and RMIT.iv, 30 pagesapplication/pdfen-AUAuthor/s retain copyright307.760994HT101.U87Urban policy -- AustraliaUrban renewal -- AustraliaHousing -- Australia199510.4225/13/590a53907cc5cCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Australia (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU)