Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

State complicity in violence against Ahmadiyah and Shi'a communities in Indonesia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Suryana, A'an

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Canberra, ACT : The Australian National University

Abstract

This thesis looks at the role of state officials in handling incidents of mass violence against Ahmadiyah and Shi’a communities in Indonesia. Scholars often criticize the post-Soeharto democratic Indonesian governments as having been incapable of addressing violence against religious minorities. This thesis argues that the violence stemmed in part from the state officials’ close connection with vigilante groups, and a general tendency for the authorities to forge mutual and material interests with such groups. Vigilante groups were able to perpetrate violence against the minority congregations with a significant degree of impunity. While the Indonesian state has become far more democratic, accountable and decentralized since 1998, the violence against Ahmadiyah and Shi’a communities shows a state that is still unwilling in assisting or allowing minority groups to practice their religion. The research undertaken for this thesis draws upon a seven-month period of ethnographic fieldwork in the communities of West Java and Madura Island. Research material includes in-depth interviews with community and religious leaders, state officials and security forces, and other prominent politicians. Studying state practices on the ground proved important, because it was at the local level where practices were most felt by citizens, and the manifestation of the state was more apparent.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads