Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Post-depositional remanent magnetization lock-in for marine sediments deduced from 10 Be and paleomagnetic records through the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Suganuma, Yusuke
Okuno, Jun'ichi
Heslop, David
Roberts, Andrew
Yamazaki, Toshitsugu
Yokoyama, Yusuke

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

Geomagnetic field intensity records from marine sediments have contributed to improved understanding of variations in the Earth's magnetic field, and have helped to establish age models for marine sediments. However, lock-in of the geomagnetic signal below the sediment-water interface in marine sediments through acquisition of a post-depositional remanent magnetization (PDRM) adds uncertainty to synchronization of marine sedimentary records. Although quantitative models enable assessment of delays in remanence acquisition associated with PDRM processes, the nature of the filter function and the PDRM lock-in zone thickness remain topics of debate. We performed both forward numerical simulations and inverse parameter estimation to assess the best-fit filter function and PDRM lock-in zone thickness in marine sediments based on a comparison of10Be flux and relative paleointensity records. Our simulations reveal that the rate of PDRM lock-in increases in the middle of the lock-in zone and that a Gaussian function with a 17cm lock-in zone thickness provides a good approximation to the PDRM lock-in within the studied core. With this function, PDRM lock-in is delayed, but with relatively little distortion of the geomagnetic signal. Our results also imply that a PDRM is not simply locked due to progressive marine sediment consolidation and dewatering, and that the arbitrary functions (linear, cubic, and exponential) that are often used to model PDRM lock-in starting from the base of the surface mixed layer cannot explain fully the observed paleomagnetic signal.

Description

Citation

Source

Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31