Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The SAMI Galaxy Survey: reconciling strong emission line metallicity diagnostics using metallicity gradients

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Poetrodjojo, Henry
Groves, Brent
Kewley, Lisa
Sweet, Sarah M
Sanchez, Sebastian F
Medling, Anne
Sanchez, Angel R Lopez
Brough, Sarah
Cortese, Luca
van de Sande, Jesse

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Abstract

We measure the gas-phase metallicity gradients of 248 galaxies selected from Data Release 2 of the SAMI Galaxy Survey. We demonstrate that there are large systematic discrepancies between the metallicity gradients derived using common strong emission linemetallicity diagnostics. We determine which pairs of diagnostics have Spearman's rank coefficients greater than 0.6 and provide linear conversions to allow the accurate comparison of metallicity gradients derived using different strong emission line diagnostics. For galaxies within the mass range 8.5 < log (M/M-circle dot) < 11.0, we find discrepancies of up to 0.11 dex/R-e between seven popular diagnostics in the metallicity gradient-mass relation. We find a suggestion of a break in the metallicity gradient-mass relation, where the slope shifts from negative to positive, occurs between 9.5 < log (M/M-circle dot) < 10.5 for the seven chosen diagnostics. Applying our conversions to the metallicity gradient-mass relation, we reduce the maximum dispersion from 0.11 dex/R-e to 0.02 dex/R-e. These conversions provide the most accurate method of converting metallicity gradients when key emission lines are unavailable. We find that diagnostics that share common sets of emission line ratios agree best, and that diagnostics calibrated through the electron temperature provide more consistent results compared to those calibrated through photoionization models.

Description

Citation

Source

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description