Open Research will be upgrading the system on Tuesday, 14 July 2026, from 8:15 to 9:00 AM. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Ethnic variation in its social context: Evidence from the English of Chinese Australians

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Gan, Qiao

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Ethnicity has been a longstanding factor in studies of language variation and change (Labov, 1966), including in pioneering work in Australia with Australians of Greek and Italian background (Horvath, 1985). This thesis focuses on linguistic variation among a community that has received less attention, Cantonese-background Chinese Australians. Drawing from the Sydney Speaks project (Travis, 2014-2022), I compare spontaneous spoken English of Chinese Australians with the Anglo majority, to examine the role of ethnicity and other social factors, particularly social class, in conditioning variation. Analyses centre around three linguistic variables, which exhibit varying degrees of change, social salience, and typological differences across English and Cantonese: the realisation of the vowel in pre-vocalic definite article the (non-glottalised FLEECE vs. glottalised FLEECE vs. schwa); future temporal reference (will vs. be going to); and existential there's + plural argument (THERE'S vs. THERE ARE). Multivariate analyses reveal little in the way of ethnic differences, including for broad measures of ethnicity and for more fine-grained measures considering ethnic orientation. Furthermore, comparisons with a corpus of English spoken in Hong Kong (Bolton, 2002), reveal differences in the linguistic conditioning in Hong Kong English, further supporting that Chinese Australians are conforming to Australian norms. However, differences do emerge for social class, and comparisons across social class reveal a strong alignment with middle class Anglo Australian norms among Chinese Australians. These findings highlight the importance of considering social context in understanding ethnic differentiation in sociolinguistic patterns, and taking account of the intersection between language and social structures.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd