Economic crisis, Henryk Grossman and the responsibility of socialists
Loading...
Authors
Kuhn, Rick
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Brill Academic Publishers
Abstract
Henryk Grossman’s discussion of economic crises was designed to
complement his Leninist understanding of politics. For Grossman, as for
Marx, the fundamental contradiction of capitalist production is between the
unlimited scope for expanding the output of use values and restrictions
imposed by the framework of producing profits. The increasing weight of
capitalists’ outlays on dead compared to living labour, which is the only
source of new value, gives rise to the system’s tendency to break down and
hence to economic crises. Deep financial crises can only be understood in
the context of developments in production and particularly movements in the
rate of profit. The initial widespread hostility to Grossman’s development of
Marxist economics can mainly be explained in terms of the logics of social
democratic and Stalinist politics. In contrast to dominant views on the left
today, the Marxist tradition in which Grossman stood places the construction
of organisations capable of assisting the working class’s conquest of
political power at the heart of the responsibility of socialists. Grossman’s
political practice expressed his understanding of the close relationship
between capitalism’s breakdown tendency and the importance of building a
revolutionary party.
Description
Citation
Iaaac and Tamara Deutscher Memorial Lecture 2008
Collections
Source
Historical Materialism: Research in Critical Marxist Theory
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description