Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Morphological classification of galaxies with deep learning: comparing 3-way and 4-way CNNs

Date

Authors

Cavanagh, Mitchell K
Bekki, Kenji
Groves, Brent

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Abstract

Classifying the morphologies of galaxies is an important step in understanding their physical properties and evolutionary histories. The advent of large-scale surveys has hastened the need to develop techniques for automated morphological classification. We train and test several convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures to classify the morphologies of galaxies in both a 3-class (elliptical, lenticular, and spiral) and a 4-class (+irregular/miscellaneous) schema with a data set of 14034 visually classified SDSS images. We develop a new CNN architecture that outperforms existing models in both 3-way and 4-way classifications, with overall classification accuracies of 83 and 81 per cent, respectively. We also compare the accuracies of 2-way/binary classifications between all four classes, showing that ellipticals and spirals are most easily distinguished (>98 per cent accuracy), while spirals and irregulars are hardest to differentiate (78 per cent accuracy). Through an analysis of all classified samples, we find tentative evidence that misclassifications are physically meaningful, with lenticulars misclassified as ellipticals tending to be more massive, among other trends. We further combine our binary CNN classifiers to perform a hierarchical classification of samples, obtaining comparable accuracies (81 per cent) to the direct 3-class CNN, but considerably worse accuracies in the 4-way case (65 per cent). As an additional verification, we apply our networks to a small sample of Galaxy Zoo images, obtaining accuracies of 92, 82, and 77 per cent for the binary, 3-way, and 4-way classifications, respectively.

Description

Citation

Source

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description