Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Looking the other way. A materialist/technological approach to classifying tools and implements, cores and retouched flakes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Hiscock, Peter

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Pennsylvania Museum

Abstract

Coherent and consistent differentiation of the categories of tool, implement, core and retouched flake has proved difficult in lithic analysis. By applying a materialist model to reconceptualise these categories it becomes possible toidentify them with minimal ambiguity and ot employ these identifications to discuss technological and use behaviours. This framework facilitates new explorations of archaeological patterning, while being of limited benefit to some conventional questions. The implications of this approach are explored using as an example the debates about the Australian 'horse-hoof' category.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Tools versus Cores: Alternative Approaches to Stone Tool Analysis

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads