Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Representing Falsehoods

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Goodin, Robert

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Abstract

Legal representatives are generally not allowed literally to lie to the court, even if their clients so instruct them. Why is there no analogous prohibition on political representatives lying in Congressional proceedings? There is just such a prohibition against witnesses lying in Congressional hearings, after all. Having considered and dismissed several potential rationales for the disparity, I offer positive reasons to think there should be, since truth-telling is functionally important to the legislative process. I discuss some ways such a norm might be enforced within existing Congressional procedures, and I point to precedents in other countries where something similar has already been done.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journal of Social Philosophy

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31