Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Social determinants of food expenditure in Australia: the role of education, income, geography and time

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Venn, Danielle
Dixon, Jane
Banwell, Cathy
Strazdins, Lyndall

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine socio-economic status (SES) and time-related factors associated with less healthy food purchases in Australia. DESIGN: Data were from the 2009/10 Household Expenditure Survey (HES) conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Regression analysis was used to examine the associations between the proportion of the household food budget spent on various food types (processed and unprocessed foods, foods purchased from takeaways and restaurants) and SES and time constraint variables. SETTING: Australia, 2009-2010. SUBJECTS: Nationally representative sample of Australian households. RESULTS: Household income seems to be the most important correlate with food expenditure patterns once other SES indicators are controlled for. Time constraints appear to explain some, but not all, of the adjusted SES gradients in food expenditure. Comparing home food consumption categories (processed and unprocessed foods) with foods purchased away from home (takeaway and restaurant foods) shows that wealthier, more highly educated and least disadvantaged households spend relatively less of their total food budget on processed and unprocessed foods prepared at home and more on foods purchased away from home at restaurants. CONCLUSIONS: Simple SES gradients in dietary behaviour are influenced by correlations between different SES indicators and between SES and time constraints. Examining these factors separately obscures some of the possible causal effects of disadvantage on healthy eating. When formulating policy responses to unhealthy diets, policy makers should consider alternative sources of disadvantage, including time pressure.

Description

Citation

Source

Public Health Nutrition

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until