Unintended consequences: Fluid resuscitation worsens shock in an ovine model of endotoxemia

dc.contributor.authorByrne, Liam
dc.contributor.authorObonyo, Nchafatso G
dc.contributor.authorDiab, Sara
dc.contributor.authorDunster, Kimble
dc.contributor.authorPassmore, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorBoon, Ai Ching
dc.contributor.authorHoe, Louise See
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Sanne
dc.contributor.authorFauzi, Mohd Hashairi
dc.contributor.authorPimenta, Leticia Pretti
dc.contributor.authorVan Haren, Frank
dc.contributor.authorAnstey, Christopher M
dc.contributor.authorCullen, L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T04:34:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.updated2020-11-02T04:23:45Z
dc.description.abstractRationale: Fluid resuscitation is widely considered a life-saving intervention in septic shock; however, recent evidence has brought both its safety and efficacy in sepsis into question. Objectives: In this study, we sought to compare fluid resuscitation with vasopressors with the use of vasopressors alone in a hyperdynamic model of ovine endotoxemia. Methods: Endotoxemic shock was induced in 16 sheep, after which they received fluid resuscitation with 40 ml/kg of 0.9% saline or commenced hemodynamic support with protocolized noradrenaline and vasopressin. Microdialysis catheters were inserted into the arterial circulation, heart, brain, kidney, and liver to monitor local metabolism. Blood samples were recovered to measure serum inflammatory cytokines, creatinine, troponin, atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide, and hyaluronan. All animals were monitored and supported for 12 hours after fluid resuscitation. Measurements and Main Results: After resuscitation, animals that received fluid resuscitation required significantly more noradrenaline to maintain the same mean arterial pressure in the subsequent 12 hours (68.9 mg vs. 39.6 mg; P = 0.04). Serum cytokines were similar between groups. Atrial natriuretic peptide increased significantly after fluid resuscitation compared with that observed in animals managed without fluid resuscitation (335 ng/ml [256-382] vs. 233 ng/ml [144-292]; P = 0.04). Cross-sectional time-series analysis showed that the rate of increase of the glycocalyx glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan was greater in the fluid-resuscitated group over the course of the study (P = 0.02). Conclusions: Fluid resuscitation resulted in a paradoxical increase in vasopressor requirement. Additionally, it did not result in improvements in any of the measured microcirculatory- or organspecific markers measured. The increase in vasopressor requirement may have been due to endothelial/glycocalyx damage secondary to atrial natriuretic peptide-mediated glycocalyx shedding.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank the Australian Red Cross Blood Service for its support in conducting the study. J.F.F. received a fellowship from the Queensland Health Office of Health and Medical Research.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1073-449Xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/220348
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherAmerican Thoracic Societyen_AU
dc.rights© 2018 by the American Thoracic Societyen_AU
dc.sourceAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicineen_AU
dc.subjectsepsisen_AU
dc.subjectseptic shocken_AU
dc.subjectfluid resuscitationen_AU
dc.subjectendotoxemiaen_AU
dc.titleUnintended consequences: Fluid resuscitation worsens shock in an ovine model of endotoxemiaen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue8en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1054en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1043en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationByrne, Liam, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationObonyo, Nchafatso G, The Critical Care Research Groupen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDiab, Sara, The Critical Care Research Groupen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDunster, Kimble, The Critical Care Research Groupen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPassmore, Margaret, The Critical Care Research Groupen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBoon, Ai Ching, The Critical Care Research Groupen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHoe, Louise See, The Critical Care Research Groupen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPedersen, Sanne, The Prince Charles Hospitalen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationFauzi, Mohd Hashairi, Universiti Sains Malaysiaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPimenta, Leticia Pretti, The Prince Charles Hospitalen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationVan Haren, Frank, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAnstey, Christopher M, Sunshine Coast University Hospitalen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCullen, L., Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospitalen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidByrne, Liam, u5652829en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidVan Haren, Frank, u5325459en_AU
local.description.embargo2099-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor110310 - Intensive Careen_AU
local.identifier.absseo920103 - Cardiovascular System and Diseasesen_AU
local.identifier.absseo920109 - Infectious Diseasesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4485658xPUB1351en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume198en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1164/rccm.201801-0064OCen_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85054893564
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.ajrccm.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Byrne_Unintended_consequences%3A_Fluid_2018.pdf
Size:
856.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format