The Relevance of Human Nature

dc.contributor.authorSouthwood, Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-29T22:55:36Z
dc.date.available2018-11-29T22:55:36Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.updated2020-12-20T07:41:04Z
dc.description.abstractThe so-called "Human Nature Constraint" holds that if an agent is unable, due to features of human nature, to bring herself to act in a certain way, then this suffices to block or negate the claim that the agent is required to act in that way. David Estlund (2011) has recently mounted a forceful objection to the Human Nature Constraint. I argue that Estlund�s objection fails � but instructively, in a way that gives Estlund resources for a different way of resisting attempts to negate normative claims by deploying the Human Nature Constraint.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1559-3061
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/153214
dc.publisherUniversity of Southern California
dc.sourceJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy
dc.titleThe Relevance of Human Nature
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage8
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.contributor.affiliationSouthwood, Nicholas, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.authoremailu4036392@anu.edu.au
local.contributor.authoruidSouthwood, Nicholas, u4036392
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor220319 - Social Philosophy
local.identifier.absseo970122 - Expanding Knowledge in Philosophy and Religious Studies
local.identifier.ariespublicationu8205243xPUB908
local.identifier.citationvolume9
local.identifier.doi.26556/jesp.v9i3.178
local.identifier.uidSubmittedByu8205243
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Southwood_The_Relevance_of_Human_Nature_2015.pdf
Size:
215.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format