Communicating science through entertainment television: How the sitcom The Big Bang Theory influences audience perceptions of science and scientists
Abstract
This study aimed to explore whether entertainment television can
increase the public’s engagement with science. The motivation
for the study was the 2010 Inspiring Australia report, a national
strategic plan to engage the Australian public with science. One
of the ‘key principles’ stated in Inspiring Australia was the
need to strengthen the media’s role in communicating science,
including entertainment television. However, there has been
little empirical research into how adults engage with the science
content in entertainment television shows to validate (or to
refute) the effectiveness of this key principle. In order to
investigate whether and how entertainment television has
influenced audiences’ perceptions of science and scientists, I
chose the American sitcom The Big Bang Theory as a case study
since it is scientifically accurate and its main characters are
scientists. Data were collected using 18 focus groups with 74
regular viewers of the show.
Overall the program made science seem less dry and more
interesting to the participants, and made scientists seem less
socially isolated, humanising them. It positioned science and
scientists as part of society rather than separate from it. With
respect to whether the show influenced people’s information
seeking behaviours related to science, and science knowledge,
personal experiences had a larger impact than watching The Big
Bang Theory. However, the show did stimulate some people to find
out more about the science information the show presented, and
responses demonstrated that people can learn about aspects of the
nature of science from watching entertainment television.
Participants felt the scientist characters in The Big Bang Theory
both conformed to and contradicted their preconceived images of
scientists and their understanding of scientist stereotypes. They
were surprised the characters had personal lives and romantic
relationships, and as a result, felt scientists were more
approachable. Participants indicated their frustration that the
female scientist characters were introduced and written as love
interests, but appreciated that they were shown as successful
scientists too. People had mixed feelings about them being mainly
in the biological sciences (rather than being physicists and
engineers, like the main male characters), but indicated that on
television, good value entertainment was more important than
portraying gender balance in science.
Although the participants indicated that the science content in
The Big Bang Theory was an important contributor to their
enjoyment of and interest in the program, they also asserted that
relatability, characters, humour, and geek culture references
were equally or sometimes more important. However, people cared
strongly about scientific accuracy even if the science was being
treated as secondary or used as a backdrop of the show.
In summary, some audiences of The Big Bang Theory engaged
actively with its science content and changed their views of
scientists. Therefore, it is possible to use entertainment
television to reach people who are not actively seeking
science-related content, because if it doesn’t just focus on
science it makes the show - and therefore the science - more
accessible for the public.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description