Closure, Contrast, and Answer

Date

Authors

Schaffer, Jonathan

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

Abstract

How should the contrastivist formulate closure? That is, given that knowledge is a ternary contrastive state Kspq (s knows that p rather than q), how does this state extend under entailment? In what follows, I will identify adequacy conditions for closure, criticize the extant invariantist and contextualist closure schemas, and provide a contrastive schema based on the idea of extending answers. I will conclude that only the contrastivist can adequately formulate closure.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Philosophical Studies

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31