Closure, Contrast, and Answer
Date
Authors
Schaffer, Jonathan
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Abstract
How should the contrastivist formulate closure? That is, given that knowledge is a ternary contrastive state Kspq (s knows that p rather than q), how does this state extend under entailment? In what follows, I will identify adequacy conditions for closure, criticize the extant invariantist and contextualist closure schemas, and provide a contrastive schema based on the idea of extending answers. I will conclude that only the contrastivist can adequately formulate closure.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Philosophical Studies
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31
Downloads
File
Description