Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A Comparison of Measures of Hedging Effectiveness: A Case Study using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures Contract

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Brailsford, Tim
Corrigan, K
Heaney, R.A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

Several techniques to assess the effectiveness of a hedge have been suggested in the literature. While these techniques hold theoretical appeal, there is little empirical evidence as to their effectiveness. This paper provides an empirical comparison of three measures of hedge effectiveness in the context of hedging market risk using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures contract. Specifically, the Markowitz (1959) portfolio standard deviation measure, the Howard and D'Antonio (1987) <i>HBS</i> measure and the measure suggested by Lindahl (1991) are applied to assess hedge effectiveness. The results indicate that the selection of the particular measure of hedge effectiveness has a considerable impact on the assessment of hedged portfolios. Further, the paper highlights problems that arise in applications of the Lindahl (1991) and Howard and D'Antonio (1987) measures.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads