The determinants of voluntary judicial resignation in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand

Date

2014

Authors

Kerby, Matthew
Banfield, Andrew

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract

This article compares supreme and high court judicial turnover with respect to voluntary exits and retirements in three Westminster parliamentary democracies, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, for the period 1970-2012. The findings of an event history model indicate that judges who author large numbers of opinions in a given year are likely to stay longer, while those who dissent from their colleagues frequently are more likely to exit early. It was also found that judges are more likely to resign if the party that appointed them was expected to lose government.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Commonwealth & Comparative Politics (&print 1466-2043)

Type

Journal article

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31