The determinants of voluntary judicial resignation in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand
Date
2014
Authors
Kerby, Matthew
Banfield, Andrew
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Abstract
This article compares supreme and high court judicial turnover with respect to voluntary exits and retirements in three Westminster parliamentary democracies, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, for the period 1970-2012. The findings of an event history model indicate that judges who author large numbers of opinions in a given year are likely to stay longer, while those who dissent from their colleagues frequently are more likely to exit early. It was also found that judges are more likely to resign if the party that appointed them was expected to lose government.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Commonwealth & Comparative Politics (&print 1466-2043)
Type
Journal article
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31
Downloads
File
Description