Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The crustal thickness of Australia

dc.contributor.authorClitheroe, G
dc.contributor.authorGudmundsson, O
dc.contributor.authorKennett, Brian
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T23:15:41Z
dc.date.available2015-12-13T23:15:41Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.date.updated2015-12-12T08:44:33Z
dc.description.abstractWe investigate the crustal structure of the Australian continent using the temporary broadband stations of the Skippy and Kimba projects and permanent broadband stations. We isolate near-receiver information, in the form of crustal P-to-S conversions, using the receiver function technique. Stacked receiver functions are inverted for S velocity structure using a Genetic Algorithm approach to Receiver Function Inversion (GARFI). From the resulting velocity models we are able to determine the Moho depth and to classify the width of the crust-mantle transition for 65 broadband stations. Using these results and 51 independent estimates of crustal thickness from refraction and reflection profiles, we present a new, improved, map of Moho depth for the Australian continent. The thinnest crust (25 km) occurs in the Archean Yilgarn Craton in Western Australia; the thickest crust (61 km) occurs in Proterozoic central Australia. The average crustal thickness is 38.8 km (standard deviation 6.2 km). Interpolation error estimates are made using kriging and fall into the range 2.5-7.0 km. We find generally good agreement between the depth to the seismologically defined Moho and xenolith-derived estimates of crustal thickness beneath northeastern Australia. However, beneath the Lachlan Fold Belt the estimates are not in agreement, and it is possible that the two techniques are mapping differing parts of a broad Moho transition zone. The Archean cratons of Western Australia appear to have remained largely stable since cratonization, reflected in only slight variation of Moho depth. The largely Proterozoic center of Australia shows relatively thicker crust overall as well as major Moho offsets. We see evidence of the margin of the contact between the Precambrian craton and the Tasman Orogen, referred to as the Tasman Line.
dc.identifier.issn0148-0227
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/88999
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union
dc.sourceJournal of Geophysical Research
dc.subjectKeywords: continental crust; crustal structure; seismic velocity
dc.titleThe crustal thickness of Australia
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issueB6
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage13713
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage13697
local.contributor.affiliationClitheroe, G, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationGudmundsson, O, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationKennett, Brian, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidClitheroe, G, u941556
local.contributor.authoruidGudmundsson, O, u911294
local.contributor.authoruidKennett, Brian, u8413736
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor040313 - Tectonics
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub18883
local.identifier.citationvolume105
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-0034631219
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads