Discordance of international adiposity classifications in Australian boys and girls - The LOOK study
Loading...
Date
Authors
Telford, Richard
Cunningham, Ross
Daly, Robin M
Reynolds, Graham
Lafferty, Antony
Gravenmaker, Karen J
Budge, Marc
Javaid, A
Bass, Shona L
Telford, Rohan M
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Abstract
Background: Various charts based on body mass index (BMI) and per cent body fat (%BF) are used to classify childhood body composition but outcomes may vary. Aim: The study investigated variation in incidences of childhood obesity as depicted by four classification charts. Subjects and methods: BMI and DXA-derived %BF were assessed in 741 children. Incidences of overweight and obesity were compared between two BMI charts and two bioelectrical impedance (BIA)-based %BF charts. Results: The International Obesity Task Force (IOTF)-adopted BMI chart designated 21%, 6% (boys), and 26%, 9% (girls) as overweight and obese, respectively. Corresponding figures using the USA CDC BMI chart were 27%, 11% (boys) and 27%, 12% (girls). Using a USA-derived %BF chart incidences were 17%, 2% (boys) and 21%, 8% (girls) and using a UK-derived %BF chart 51%, 24% (boys) and 53%, 36% (girls). Sensitivity of BMI varied according to the %BF reference chart. Conclusions: In contrast to the BMI-based charts, there were considerable variations in depicted incidences of obesity between the %BF-based charts. These discordances were considered to result from previously reported variation within and between BIA and DXA %BF assessments underlying the charts. The present study highlights the need for valid, reliable, unchanging BIA and DXA procedures.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Annals of Human Biology
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31
Downloads
File
Description