Antiterrorism Legislation in Australia: A Proportionate Response to the Terrorist Threat?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Michaelsen, Christopher

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group

Abstract

This article examines key provisions of Australia's antiterrorism legislation introduced in the aftermath of the 11 September attacks. Never before in history has Australia witnessed a comparable overhaul of national security legislation and the introduction of laws that significantly curtail civil liberties and fundamental freedoms. A question that thus needs to be addressed is whether or not Canberra's drastic legislative measures are justified by the severity of the terrorism threat to Australia. It is argued that the actual risk of a terrorism attack occurring on Australian soil is rather low. As a consequence, the Howard government's antiterrorism laws constitute a disproportionate response that has worrisome long-term implications for Australia's legal system and its society more generally.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Studies in Conflict and Terrorism

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31