Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The legal relationship between the Australian Stock Exchange and listed companies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Spender, Peta

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Thomson Reuters

Abstract

This article will examine the legal relationship between the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) and listed companies. It will be argued that the legal framework of this relationship is so indeterminate as to raise the question of whether it creates a binding obligation upon either the ASX or listed companies. The indeterminacy of the framework is caused in part by an assumption that contract forms te basis of the relationship. That assumption will be disputed. The assumption has given rise to two distinct approaches by the judiciary in interpreting the listing relationship. One approach - the narrow school - tends to deny the efficacy of both the contract and the legal framework built upon it. By contrast, the wide school embraces the assumption as to the efficacy of the contract. In the result, the legal obligations arising from the relationship are very unclear. There have been various attempts by the legislature to bolster the operation of the contract, such as the enactment of s 777 of the Corporations Law and its predecessors. The most recent example is the passage of the Corporate Law Reform Act 1994. This Act uses the listing rules as the basis of the obligation upon listed companies to make disclosures under the continuous disclosure regime. It will be argued that these provisions only build upon the quandry and create further but dependent obligations which are confounded by the indeterminacy of the core.

Description

Citation

Source

Company and Securities Law Journal 13 (1995): 240-275

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

abcd