Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Near-rings and near-ring modules

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Scott, Stuart Donald

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Dickson [11], in 1905,first gave examples of finite nearfields, which, in 1907, were used by 0. Veblen and J.H. MaclaganWedderburn [26] to construct finite non-desarguesian and non-pascalian geometries. The problem of characterising all finite near-fields remained open until Zassenhaus [28], in 1936, showed the addition of seven proper finite near-fields to the list of Dickson's, gave the complete picture. It appears that near-rings proper were first looked at in 1932 by H. Fitting [12]. Not long after, O. Taussky [25] and B.H. Neumann [22] considered rings in which addition need not be commutative. The first real structural theorems on nearrings are due to D.W. Blackett [8], who in 1953 extended the theory of simple and semi-simple rings to near-rings. These extensions, which exhibit a great deal of ingenuity, mark, in the author's opinion, the beginning of the first serious attempt to understand near-rings.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until