Lessons from a virtual slime: marginal mechanisms, minimal cognition and radical enactivism
Abstract
Radical enactivism (REC) and similar embodied and enactive approaches to the mind deny that cognition is fundamentally representational, skull-bound and mechanistic in its organisation. In this article, I argue that modellers may still adopt a mechanistic strategy to produce explanations that are compatible with REC. This argument is scaffolded by a multi-agent model of the true slime mould Physarum polycephalum.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Adaptive Behaviour
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31