Review Essay: Why (Re) Write Judgements?
Loading...
Date
Authors
Roberts, Heather
Sweeney, Laura
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Law Book Company
Abstract
Australian Feminist Judgments is a collection of fictional judgments for real Australian cases that have been rewritten by Australian scholars from the
perspective of a feminist judge. Each judgment is introduced by a commentary, written by a different scholar, explaining the legal and historical context of the original decision and the choices made by the feminist judge. This review essay locates the collection within more general debates surrounding judgment writing, particularly leading Australian extra-judicial commentary on how and why judgments are written. Against this larger plane, we consider a number of the key issues raised by the collection about judgment writing, including the significance of recounting the facts of a case, the uses of formalist judicial method and the capacity of judgments to effect change. Drawing on a number of examples from the collection, this review essay contends that Australian Feminist Judgments makes a valuable
contribution not only to contemporary feminist debates, but also to issues going to the heart of judicial practices and judgment.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Sydney Law Review
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
2037-12-31