Comparing Experimental and Theoretical Quasifission Mass Angle Distributions

dc.contributor.authorWakhle, A.
dc.contributor.authorSimenel, C.
dc.contributor.authorHinde, David
dc.contributor.authorDasgupta, M.
dc.contributor.authorEvers, M.
dc.contributor.authorLuong, D.H.
dc.contributor.authordu Rietz, R.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-05T03:29:35Z
dc.date.available2018-11-05T03:29:35Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractWe examined the 40Ca + 238U reaction experimentally using the Mass-Angle Distribution (MAD) technique and within the Time Dependent Hartree Fock (TDHF) theory, using the TDHF3D code. A new, TDHF based approach has been developed to construct mass distributions as well. The results revealed that the orientation of the heavy deformed prolate nucleus plays a major role in the reaction outcome. It was found that aligned collisions lead to quasifission and short contact times of 5-10 zs, whilst anti-aligned collisions lead to longer contact times (> 23 zs). TDHF accurately predicted the presence of quasifission and the average mass splits in this reaction. The influence of shell effects around 208Pb in the calculated quasifission characteristics was observed in both experiment and theory.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2100-014Xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/148847
dc.publisherEDP Sciencesen_AU
dc.rights© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceEPJ Web of Conferencesen_AU
dc.titleComparing Experimental and Theoretical Quasifission Mass Angle Distributionsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage00061en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWakhle, A., Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSimenel, C., Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHinde, D., Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDasgupta, M., Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationEvers, M., Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLuong, D. H., Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationdu Rietz, R., Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu8203491en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume86en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1051/epjconf/20158600061en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.epj.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
epjconf_fusion2015_00061.pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: