Community pharmacy and cash reward: a winning combination for chlamydia screening?
dc.contributor.author | Currie, M. J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Deeks, L. S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cooper, G. M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, S. J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Parker, R. M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Del Rosario, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hocking, J. S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bowden, Francis | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-08T05:53:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-08T05:53:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-10-23 | |
dc.date.updated | 2016-02-24T09:53:23Z | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES To date, the uptake of chlamydia screening in community pharmacies has been limited. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to determine if a cash reward, offered to both the provider and the consumer of chlamydia screening, increased the uptake of screening in community pharmacies. METHODS During 4 weeks in 2011, chlamydia screening and education were offered in four city and two suburban pharmacies to people aged 16-30 years. Those who provided a urine sample for testing, contact details, and completed a brief questionnaire were rewarded with $A10. Positive participants, and their nominated contacts, were offered treatment. RESULTS Over a period of 751.5 h, 979 testing kits were requested, and 900 (93%) urine samples returned. Using probabilistic linkage methods, we determined that 671/900 (75%) urine samples were from unique individuals. 0.9 unique samples were obtained/hour of screening, 63% of which were provided by men. 19/671 (2.8%; 95% CI 1.7% to 4.4%) people tested positive, 5.2% (95% CI 2.8% to 8.8%) of women, and 1.4% (1.4 0.5 to 3.1) of men. 11/19 (58%) people were contacted and treated-two for suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. CONCLUSIONS Providing a cash reward to encourage chlamydia screening in community pharmacies resulted in greater participation rates than previously reported pharmacy-based studies, particularly among men. Easily implemented mechanisms to reduce inappropriate repeat screening, incorrect contact details and effects on pharmacy work flow may enhance the efficiency of this approach. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by a grant from the ACT Government Health Directorate Preventative Health Programme expenditure initiative. | en_AU |
dc.identifier.issn | 1368-4973 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/97981 | |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | |
dc.rights | © BMJ Publishing. | |
dc.source | Sexually Transmitted Infections | |
dc.subject | adolescent | |
dc.subject | adult | |
dc.subject | chlamydia infections | |
dc.subject | female | |
dc.subject | humans | |
dc.subject | male | |
dc.subject | mass screening | |
dc.subject | questionnaires | |
dc.subject | urine | |
dc.subject | young adult | |
dc.subject | pharmacies | |
dc.subject | reward | |
dc.title | Community pharmacy and cash reward: a winning combination for chlamydia screening? | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
local.bibliographicCitation.issue | 3 | en_AU |
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 216 | en_AU |
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 212 | en_AU |
local.contributor.affiliation | Currie, Marian, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE ANU Medical School, ANU Medical School, The Australian National University | en_AU |
local.contributor.affiliation | Deeks, Louise, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE ANU Medical School, ANU Medical School, The Australian National University | en_AU |
local.contributor.affiliation | Cooper, Gabrielle, University of Canberra, Australia | en_AU |
local.contributor.affiliation | Martin, Sarah, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE ANU Medical School, ANU Medical School, The Australian National University | en_AU |
local.contributor.affiliation | Parker, Rhian, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE Research School of Population Health, Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, The Australian National University | en_AU |
local.contributor.affiliation | Del Rosario, Rendry, ACT Health, Australia | en_AU |
local.contributor.affiliation | Hocking, Jane S, University of Melbourne, Australia | en_AU |
local.contributor.affiliation | Bowden, Francis, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, CMBE ANU Medical School, ANU Medical School, The Australian National University | en_AU |
local.contributor.authoremail | marian.currie@act.gov.au | en_AU |
local.contributor.authoruid | a227141 | en_AU |
local.description.notes | Imported from ARIES | en_AU |
local.identifier.absfor | 111717 | en_AU |
local.identifier.absseo | 920507 | en_AU |
local.identifier.absseo | 920401 | en_AU |
local.identifier.absseo | 920109 | en_AU |
local.identifier.ariespublication | u3342134xPUB2 | en_AU |
local.identifier.citationvolume | 89 | en_AU |
local.identifier.doi | 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050357 | en_AU |
local.identifier.essn | 1472-3263 | en_AU |
local.identifier.scopusID | 2-s2.0-84878209610 | |
local.identifier.uidSubmittedBy | u3488905 | en_AU |
local.type.status | Published Version | en_AU |
Downloads
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 884 B
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: