Margin status and survival outcomes after breast cancer conservation surgery: prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorBundred, James R
dc.contributor.authorMichael, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Beth
dc.contributor.authorCutress, Ramsey
dc.contributor.authorBeckmann, Kerri R.
dc.contributor.authorHolleczek, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorDahlstrom, Jane
dc.contributor.authorGath, Jacqui
dc.contributor.authorDodwell, David
dc.contributor.authorBundred, Nigel J
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-13T05:23:50Z
dc.date.available2024-05-13T05:23:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2023-01-15T07:17:18Z
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine if margin involvement is associated with distant recurrence and to determine the required margin to minimise both local recurrence and distant recurrence in early stage invasive breast cancer. Design Prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Data sources Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Proquest online databases. Unpublished data were sought from study authors. Eligibility criteria Eligible studies reported on patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (for stages I-III breast cancer), allowed an estimation of outcomes in relation to margin status, and followed up patients for a minimum of 60 months. Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ only or treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or by mastectomy were excluded. Where applicable, margins were categorised as tumour on ink (involved), close margins (no tumour on ink but <2 mm), and negative margins (≥2 mm). Results 68 studies from 1 January 1980 to 31 December 2021, comprising 112 140 patients with breast cancer, were included. Across all studies, 9.4% (95% confidence interval 6.8% to 12.8%) of patients had involved (tumour on ink) margins and 17.8% (13.0% to 23.9%) had tumour on ink or a close margin. The rate of distant recurrence was 25.4% (14.5% to 40.6%) in patients with tumour on ink, 8.4% (4.4% to 15.5%) in patients with tumour on ink or close, and 7.4% (3.9% to 13.6%) in patients with negative margins. Compared with negative margins, tumour on ink margins were associated with increased distant recurrence (hazard ratio 2.10, 95% confidence interval 1.65 to 2.69, P<0.001) and local recurrence (1.98, 1.66 to 2.36, P<0.001). Close margins were associated with increased distant recurrence (1.38, 1.13 to 1.69, P<0.001) and local recurrence (2.09, 1.39 to 3.13, P<0.001) compared with negative margins, after adjusting for receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In five studies published since 2010, tumour on ink margins were associated with increased distant recurrence (2.41, 1.81 to 3.21, P<0.001) as were tumour on ink and close margins (1.44, 1.22 to 1.71, P<0.001) compared with negative margins. Conclusions Involved or close pathological margins after breast conserving surgery for early stage, invasive breast cancer are associated with increased distant recurrence and local recurrence. Surgeons should aim to achieve a minimum clear margin of at least 1 mm. On the basis of current evidence, international guidelines should be revised.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipDD received funding from Cancer Research UK (C8225/A21133).en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0959-8138en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/317476
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_AU
dc.publisherBritish Medical Associationen_AU
dc.rights© 2022 The authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licenceen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceBMJ (Clinical research ed.)en_AU
dc.titleMargin status and survival outcomes after breast cancer conservation surgery: prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysisen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpagee070346en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBundred, James R , Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMichael, Sarah, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationStewart, Beth, Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCutress, Ramsey, Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBeckmann, Kerri R., The University of Adelaideen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHolleczek, Bernd, Division of Clinical Epidemiology Aging Research, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germanyen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDahlstrom, Jane, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGath, Jacqui, Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UKen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDodwell, David, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBundred, Nigel J , Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailu3725583@anu.edu.auen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidDahlstrom, Jane, u3725583en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor321104 - Cancer therapy (excl. chemotherapy and radiation therapy)en_AU
local.identifier.absseo200105 - Treatment of human diseases and conditionsen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB35860en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume378en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1136/bmj-2022-070346en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85138227113
local.identifier.uidSubmittedBya383154en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.bmj.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
bmj-2022-070346.full.pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: